#copyright

88 posts · Last used 16h

RE: https://chx.contact/@chx/117565146734905205 Canadian citizens and residents: please review and if you support sign this petition. #copyright #TPM
Quoting
This is what @pluralistic@mamot.fr wanted: a petition to the Canadian Parliament to repeal the anti-circumvention law. If you are eligible you really should sign this. https://www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-7718
Open quoted post
0
0
1
0
Now That The Shoe Is On The Other Foot, Microsoft And Epic... #ai #law #copyright #fairuse #decompilation #gaming #epic #microsoft
0
14
0
0
This slipped past my radar when it happened, but this ruling is a significant sea change in #copyright vs #LLMs training theft. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled on September 29, 2026, in Thomson #Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence, that using copyrighted text to train an #AI model does not constitute fair use when the AI product directly competes with the original work.  For authors and artists who have seen prompts like “in the style of Terry Pratchett, or in the style of David Hockney”, this is an important ruling. All bets are off when it comes to the Supremes though. I guess we need to find out how much Reuters has preemptively paid #GOP whisperers to know if things will go their way.
104
9
125
0
RE: https://ec.social-network.europa.eu/@EUCommission/117381410942959608 I boosted this when it appeared but there are a distressing number of people who have just posted their views as replies. In case it's not clear, the way to influence the @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu on #AI and #Copyright is to respond to the consultation, not post aggressive comments in reply to the notice.
Quoting
Under what conditions should copyright-protected content be used for AI training? 🗣️We know this is a topic many of you feel strongly about. We want to hear your views on issues related to the use of copyright-protected content for training AI models, for research, and more. 📝Consultation open until 3 November 2026. https://link.europa.eu/JbhGpG
Open quoted post
63
8
87
0
I'm starting to see signs other people are slowly coming the realization that AI companies have more enshittification cards in their hand. I attended an Anthropic training hosted by Anthropic employees. During the presentation, on almost every slide, the trainer reiterated "If you're experiencing issues with the quality or correctness of the output, you can solve that by giving Claude more access to your internal documentation and intellectual property." Almost every answer to every question included "and make sure you give Claude full access to your files and identity so it see everything you see and act as you." As a nearly 30yr veteran of infosec, I assumed this was an advanced adversary attempting to exploit us. 😂 The AI companies _WILL_ eventually operate solely by extracting value from all their customers and business relationships for their shareholders. We already know what this looks like. Anyone bought an Amazon Basics product? Amazon tracks products that do well, they then rip off the design of those products and launch a cheaper version under the Amazon Basics brand. "But, Brad, AI companies are more ethical than.. no wait, I heard it." Right, so, let's say you're Cursor. You announce a profit for the first time in your history. What happens next? OpenAI raises your rates to nullify your entire profit. This happened, in real life. You're a math researcher working on a research problem with a prize using OpenAI for assistance. What happens next? OpenAI rips off all your work and uses it to train an expert model to solve the problem and win the prize. This happened. Wake up, sheeple! 😂 If you have a good idea and use _any_ thirdparty AI service to create it, you are handing your work over to the AI companies and your competitors. Legal precedent is AI generated code is not IP because a human didn't create it. But every line of code Claude or Codex generates for your proprietary application is stored on their servers for as long as they afford to save it. As these companies pivot to IPO and beyond, just take a moment to consider the history of Silicon Valley and what their next steps are for further monetizing the data they're collecting on you. #fuck_ai #llm #privacy #security #copyright
95
17
90
1
Albanese #auspol open to “changing copyright laws in a bid to attract AI investment in Australia. #ai #technology #crime #copyright I’m so angry. Legalising theft. Never ever talking about how indiscriminate use of AI & #tech is destroying our environment & climate. #environment #climatechange #energy #water #fossilfuels #australia
6
0
10
0

As someone whose published work has already been ripped off by Anthropic** for unagreed, uncompensated, use in their LLM training models, I found Albanese‘s remarks on copyright protection of creative work distressing: “There’s a way through this” for people to still have control & for there to be ‘monetarisation’ of it (yes, that’s the word he used, later correcting himself to ‘monetised’). This is not what he previously promised, & what I understand is that he now wants to change Australia’s copyright laws to suit the big AI companies rather than protect creatives.

After all those weasel words, loved Jacqui Lambie’s: “Like dinosaurs from Jurassic Park they keep on testing the fences…” 😀🙏🏻 Give that speechwriter a medal! 🥇

** briefly listed in the Anthropic class action to-be-compensated database but never compensated because my publishers were not US publishers.

#Insiders #AI #LLMs #LLMTrainingModels #Anthropic #Australia #AusPol #dataMining #copyright #likeJurassicParkDinosaursTheyKeepOnTestingTheFences

46
4
43
1

so i have questions about #Debian:

  1. are members ONLY developers?

  2. only developers argued for/against #LLM #AI?

devs are the last people who should be involved in discussions about the ethics and legality of software. ie:

just reckoned, when a court recently decided you can't claim #copyright on #aislop, it didn't occur to me it means both closed and open copyright.

so, if using LLMs trained on works stolen or added without consent removes any claims of #FLOSS: what is Debian now? …🧵

84
57
75
0
and i OOP! ❝ The decision, handed down on Friday 31 July by the Munich Regional Court, ruled that Suno’s use of the songs was in breach of both the German and US #copyright #law, and that the #AI platform unlawfully obtained, processed and reproduced #music that was represented by GEMA.❞ 'Stolen intellectual property': German court rules AI music generator Suno broke copyright rules
6
0
12
0
¡VICTORIA LEGAL! 📢 El Tribunal Regional de Múnich falla en favor de los creadores: «Los modelos de IA basados en el robo de propiedad intelectual no están protegidos por la ley» SUNO pierde la demanda por haber violado derechos de autor y deberá pagar una indemnización por daños y perjuicios 🔥 FUENTE: https://www.reuters.com/world/german-court-rules-ai-music-firm-suno-broke-copyright-rules-2026-07-31/ #AI #genAI #SUNO #gema #german #court #copyright #music #tech #technology #generativeAI #author #creators #creation #art #germany
76
14
75
2