2026-11-02 03:58 UTC
Replies (14)
-
@eicker@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 03:59
For years we’ve been told to watch the full clip for context. Now two people can watch the same live event, hear completely different words, and both have video evidence. Microsoft has somehow found a way to make »I saw it with my own eyes« even less reliable.
-
@pdxfed@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 04:18
Who would have thought AI would be used for this? Everyone, forever.
-
@Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-11-02 04:19
Creepy
-
@Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 04:28
Is there really no legal liability for the defamation cases this seems sure to produce?
-
@supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 2026-11-02 04:38
Do you think Microslop can use this to help get out of being held accountable for directly profiting off of the Palestinian Genocide?
-
@belochka@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 04:44
That’s not already patented? Anyway. Just means that now voices of authority are just voices (again). Some things about Victorian ideas of law and authority were good. Some bad, like that these things don’t extend to barbaric areas of the world, those are to make money selling stuff and growing cotton. This is in some sense feedback to radio, mass media and the internet, as devices of propaganda. Provided, of course, everyone knows that such things can be done, but honestly they already know.
-
@fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2026-11-02 06:32
On one hand, translating movies and shows would be a great use case. But we all know that’s not what thisll get used for.
-
@NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2026-11-02 06:38
I don’t see this being any good for anyone. But I am really pissed off that this can be patented. Even looking at the patent itself doesn’t look like anything new, its a series of flow charts. I see nothing novel or patent worthy here at all.
-
@frostypanda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-11-02 06:38
Great. You’re not going to be able to trust anything anymore. On the bright side as we light the world on fire and raze it to the ground, this will probably be used hostilely to hilarious effect on a world leader/leaders at some point. Soon, I think the only way to communicate is going to be through a combination of snail mail delivered in person (or sent via trusted means) and creative uses of morse code.
-
@Supamanc@sopuli.xyz 2026-11-02 07:04
So someone saw ‘the Capture’ and thought “that’s a great idea”.
-
@brsrklf@jlai.lu 2026-11-02 08:01
Even when the goal isn’t misinformation… Removing filler words, personal and colloquial terms, replacing words for more appropriate ones according to an “internet search”. Who would be subjected to that willingly? Why even use a real human in the process at this point?
-
@DangerNooble@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 08:19
The death of language
-
@oinari@piefed.zip 2026-11-02 07:20
A whole new level of fake news to come. Boomers won’t even know what hit ‘em.
-
@LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2026-11-04 03:22
To me this is like reading that locks are now obsolete because somebody invented a way to unlock them just by touching them. On one hand it makes me angry that somebody would invent such a thing. On the other hand it means locks have always had this hidden weakness which would inevitably be figured out. Now that somebody has, what do we do next? I mean, in terms of things that might actually help?