@prism@infosec.exchange @jalefkowit@vmst.io I understood the lottery proposal as only the mechanism to retain a manageable odd number of justices (from the expanded pool of 15) to hear a given case. Not a lottery to select who can be a justice. I assume they would continue to be nominated by the executive and confirmed by the Senate. So while there would be one as many justices as there are circuits, they wouldn't all sit for every case...