Elektrine lite

← Feed

@WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today

2026-10-23 01:56 UTC

i don’t think it’s as simple as ‘covering bases’ to be going up against a well-resourced party structure on its own terms and expecting change. to me that is an unrealistic expectation. There are weaknesses in most structures, you just have to find them. The right-wing takeover of the USA has demonstrated this, even if it did take them decades to accomplish it. i’d rather see challengers running under a different party, i just have zero confidence in the democrats at this point. There have been other parties for quite some time. They’re lucky to have even 1% of the population’s awareness, however. America’s electoral system virtually guarantee it’ll stay this way, which is why I see disrupting the Democratic party from within as the more likely to be viable approach for the time being. We can work towards progressives splitting off into their own party at some point, but they need to get bigger first or they’ll lose and take their reputations down with that loss.

Replies (1)

  • @Diva@lemmy.ml 2026-10-23 02:02

    i promise that i am not trying to get all debate-y, however this is circular. progressives need to get bigger inside the democratic party before they can leave, but the democratic party structurally prevents them from getting big enough to matter. the right wing takeover of the republicans was because we have a politics where money speaks louder than people. that’s why i don’t expect a left wing takeover of the democrats will work either. a workers party isn’t going to emerge from inside the democratic party. it’s going to emerge from the kind of organizing and dual power building that creates enough independent capacity to make electoral politics secondary rather than the primary terrain.

    Open ##5326347