@rootwyrm @Dio9sys @da_667 i checked this specific CVE in @vulncheck and I'm happy to report that they report no PoCs for the vuln. They are a paid service but I suspect 'you get what you pay for' is the name of the game. Free search results? full of slop, because it makes you keep searching. I only hope they can keep up with all the slop that is incoming, without getting overwhelmed themselves. Of course if you happen to find one that works, then they are wrong in the other direction ;-). So far though they have been pretty good for identifying vulns that have actual, functioning poc.