2026-04-15 18:50 UTC
@buherator @badkeys No, they thought they were generating an ECDSA key, for which a 256 or 384 bit would be strong. But, they didn't provide the right arguments, and wound up with RSA. I think the OP posted the private key that they were able to crack trivially.
Replies (1)
-
@buherator@infosec.place 2026-04-15 19:17
@mcr314 @badkeys Source? I doubt someone who makes a mistake like this knows what ECDSA is.