2026-02-24 05:55 UTC
@gsprs@mastodon.social @mcc@mastodon.social @nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt @luana@wetdry.world I see you keep insisting on the corposcum-approved "Open Source" label for some reason.
I don't care about Open Source. My profile is quite clear about that.
Is there hiding in the choice of an avatar that is more relatable and pleasant than the meat I am stuck with? Which do you think I consider more of a mask to facilitate social interaction and which I consider more honest broadcasting of my interests and personality?
I have no guilt in the flaws of the flesh which I have no responsibility for. Distaste, certainly, but no guilt. Unfortunately it's not even a matter of money, I simply cannot get it fixed.
I could clapback for the macbook face but honestly I don't really see why an avatar & broadcasted choice of aesthetics is supposed to be a negative (even if one has bad taste, it's at least clear).
Replies (1)
-
@gsprs@mastodon.social 2026-02-24 06:04
@lispi314@udongein.xyz @mcc@mastodon.social @nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt @luana@wetdry.world What would you have me call Bitwarden instead of open source? "Free software"? If you did you'd be completely wrong, Bitwarden does not fit that definition since it has proprietary modules, proprietary enterprise features, proprietary infrastructure for the official server and so on. Rule #1 of LARPing as a tech vegan warrior is to look up what these terms mean so you don't embarrass yourself attempting to correct others like you just did.