2026-05-05 07:26 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place 2026-05-05 09:27
@dymaxion @bascule honestly, I think we would be better not electrifying our current car and spending that effort on more public transport and more lightweight solution like electric bike but that's probably another subject. IMO, the doubling point is only because lithium had more R&D than sodium. Wikipedia say the density range is 75-200 W·h/kg against 160-300 for standard lithium. They also said aince 1991, the lithium density improved threefold. I would not be surprised if sodium catch up
-
@bascule@mas.to 2026-05-05 13:38
@dymaxion @gkrnours it's not that simple. EVs have significantly lower brake dust emissions due to regenerative braking. For the tire study, the most widely circulated one from Emissions Analytics notes "it's not especially an electric vehicle problem", and that EVs often use different less toxic rubber formulations, and ICE are getting heavier too https://www.emissionsanalytics.com/news/how-tyre-emissions-hide-in-plain-sight Newer studies suggest EVs produce lower particulate emissions than ICE: https://ev.com/news/study-reveals-evs-produce-less-brake-and-tire-pollution-with-fewer-non-exhaust-emissions