@flyingpenguin@infosec.exchange
2026-09-04 22:02 UTC
@malwaretech@infosec.exchange oh viability! better, but you said availability, and that's why I said it's off by a year. if it's viability then your own privesc tree automates with a Python script. can we agree Copilot, running Codex, wrote those from June 2021? then GPT-3 spear-phish was outclicking humans at Black Hat in August 2021. Check Point's January 2023 sightings were people self-attributing to ChatGPT, but that's as bad a vendors self-crediting. and even then it's the observed, not the whole. I guess I have more evidence to dig up.
Replies (1)
-
@malwaretech@infosec.exchange 2026-09-04 22:32
@flyingpenguin@infosec.exchange I feel like you're trying too hard to make widespread AI cyberattacks a thing. I deliberately structured my entire argument around the fact that people would still attempt to resurrect their AI-boogeyman no matter what I said. "For argument’s sake, let’s take CrowdStrike’s AI-enabled claims at face value, assume AI is driving the drop in breakout times, and that trend does continue as a result of it. The core argument of this piece still stands, regardless of opinions on why breakout times are dropping."