2026-04-01 21:20 UTC
@itamarst @aredridel @glyph it's not even just 4x as much; every MR requires 4x (or more) as much effort as a human written one, because the modes of failure are completely different. For human written MRs a general heuristic of "if it looks good, it's good" is applicable to some extent, but LLMs are optimized to generate code that "looks good" and that makes reviewer's eyes glaze and that passes the review successfully, regardless of its actual quality.
Replies (1)
-
@aredridel@kolektiva.social 2026-04-01 21:21
@IngaLovinde Huh I don't find this at all. It looks like a featureless soup — that ‘eyes glaze over', I guess, is a fail to me.