@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social
2026-11-02 20:56 UTC
Note: the motion includes a request for an administrative stay, which does not depend on assessment of the underlying merits of the substantive injunctive relief requested. If Kagan or the full Court grants an administrative stay, CA would have to hold aside the ballots while Kagan or the full Court considers the substantive injunction. 8/
Replies (1)
-
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social 2026-11-02 21:00
Just the grant of an administrative stay would create uncertainty and confusion about CA’s counting and certification of results. The Supreme Court is not obligated to decide one way or the other on a requested administrative stay. So the Roberts Court could simply let events take their full course, without getting involved in this litigation. 9/