2026-11-06 19:49 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-11-06 20:00
The thing that impacts care more than sex is the hormones in the blood. If care is based on gender assignment rather than the hormones in their body, it can be equally disastrous.
-
@HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 2026-11-06 20:35
Which is why we need to put M/W/N/(etc.) on driver’s licenses while medical professionals have access to M/F/I/(etc.) Even from the ostensible purpose of M/F on a driver’s license of efficient identification, it’s lacking. Then there’s the medical downsides you state - I’m sure you’re aware many medical professionals check IDs rather than sequencing someone’s sex chromosomes before performing emergency or other care.
-
@LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 2026-11-06 20:53
Except the drugs are originally always tested on men for efficacy, anyway so moot point. …yale.edu/…/a-drug-for-women-tested-on-men/ Yes you need to tell a doctor if you might have different organs than you apear to have, maybe there’s an ectopic pregnancy, but medications, yeah not so much.
-
@Apytele@sh.itjust.works 2026-11-06 23:10
I have some antitrust issues with Epic (the EMR) but they have a literal checklist option where you literally just check which organs the pt had at birth then can specify whether or not they still have them. Super simple, cuts straight to the medically relevant info, and covers all areas from binary cis to intersex to pre, mid, and post transition. Best way I’ve ever seen it done.