2026-10-31 20:32 UTC
What is the goal?
If the CEO apologize, yeah great fine.
I already saw a lot of megalomaniac CEO apologize for their shity behaviour.
Yeah I’m talking about GAFAM.
But it’s not enough.
A CEO change, yeah OK, why not.
He will certainly get a huge golden parachute paid by our subscriptions.
Will the entreprise culture change? I’m not sure about that.
Look at Boeing.
I chose the proton suite for differents reasons, one of them was the promise of privacy for my data.
Pushing code without taking time to test everything mean chaos.
And the risks of something going wrong or extremely wrong is huge enough for me to say the trust relationship is broken.
I won’t enable this BS, and I won’t fund the golden parachute of a asshat CEO with my money.
Replies (1)
-
@Bronzie@sh.itjust.works 2026-10-31 21:36
Honestly, it’s always a balance between my morality and convenience/price. I find it harder and harder to find any company at all with a clean enough record to be “worthy” of my business. What Proton has done now goes beyond what I am willing to support, and I dislike the treatment of workers more than I dislike the increase in usage of LLM. At the same time, backlash is usually an efficient way to force companies to change course, which is why I bothered for the first time ever to formulate an email to complain. Will it make a difference this time? I doubt it. But I’m hoping for a “No Mans Sky”-turnaround as I quite enjoy their product suite. Time will tell.