@vantiss@social.treehouse.systems
2026-04-29 07:17 UTC
@adrienne @atax1a
for now it seems like you're ok? it's all about their chatbot
but also, ugh ew ick:
Demanding to “speak to a human” solely because the bot is an AI may constitute robophobic exclusionary behaviour and will not be tolerated. Requests for human assistance are, of course, welcome where there is a genuine need, such as accessibility, safety, account issues, or complex support matters. However, insisting on a human simply because the bot lacks a childhood, a favourite sandwich, or the ability to look disappointed in a meeting is inconsistent with our commitment to tolerance and respect.
Replies (3)
-
@atax1a@infosec.exchange 2026-04-29 07:19
@vantiss @adrienne it's slopinclusion by cisoid gobshites and we hate it
-
@YKantRachelRead@social.treehouse.systems 2026-04-29 07:27
@vantiss @adrienne @atax1a men will literally post screeds about "robophobia" to preemptively defend their chatbot before they acknowledge women's humanity
-
@soc@chaos.social 2026-04-29 13:44
@vantiss @adrienne @atax1a Thoughts & prayers that this clank-fucker gets the help they "need", I guess? 🤷