2026-10-27 20:06 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@bowsertattoo@piefed.social 2026-10-27 22:19
Hasn’t there already been precedent that copyright doesn’t cover AI generated works? So how to these companies plan on legally selling their games, when it’s actually legal to just copy and share them?
-
@danielquinn@lemmy.ca 2026-10-27 22:03
Epic will simply pay Anthropic a “sabotage your LLM to refuse to undermine our products” fee and then they’ll pass the costs onto their users. The only useful LLM (and I recognise that that word is doing a lot of heavy lifting) is one that you own and control. Everything else is just letting some techbro limit what you can do.
-
@sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-10-28 00:51
So… this story actually gets funnier. Yes that’s right, Teeny Weeny Tim Sweeny showed up in the replies to personally immediately destroy any potential good will this story could possibly have generated for him and Epic. Keep swingin’ Tim. One of these days, we’ll be able to get rid of the tee ball stand… one of these days…
-
@queermunist@lemmy.ml 2026-10-28 13:37
We’re going to find out that AI was trained on stolen source code and isn’t actually reverse engineering anything.