Post by @lemmygarden@lemmy.today

2026-11-02 02:46 UTC

I don’t see any way this is a politically coherent move for her. She just burnt her bridges with Leftist Democrats and corporate Democrats. She doesn’t have the look to be a talking head on conservative media. Michigan has early voting and many have already voted. It’s not like Republicans will respect her, but they use her for the moment. I’ve seen some mentions of her Republican fiance effecting her, but she is a congressmen and has agency and ownership of her own endorsements. I am wondering if her mental stability is all there because I’m confused by her lack of coherency.

Replies (4)

@reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 03:07

Not corporate Dems. They will swing towards the money any which way it comes.

Open ##5507857
@andrewrgross@lemmy.today 2026-11-02 04:02

Agreed. Tactically, if she wanted him to lose she should’ve just stuck to what she was doing, which was supporting him in words while undermining and maintaining plausible deniability. Then if he loses, you can lament that there was just no saving a flawed candidate. Now if he wins, she’s a loser twice over, and if he loses it’s a phyric victory: she’s the villain who lost Democrats the seat, and instead of proving his politics can’t win in a swing state, the story is just that he got stabbed in the back by an ally.

Open ##5507961
@assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 07:20

Its the wrong move politically but the right move for AIPAC and that is all that matters for Mrs Israel comes with to me in my dreams.

Open ##5510934
@rafoix@lemmy.zip 2026-11-02 07:21

I don’t see any way this is a politically coherent move for her. The writing is on the wall. AIPAC is forever toxic for anyone with even a tiny amount of critical thinking skills. That only leaves the GOP and Zionist owned cable news shows as viable paid options.

Open ##5510937