2026-11-04 16:40 UTC
@vathpela@infosec.exchange @jcoglan@mastodon.social so "AI" is a broken corporate system that refuses to fix itself giving itself permission to fix itself but ONLY if it does it through the jingly-keys "AI" technology. seems silly. what if instead we introduced macro systems and learning to program, and called it "supertechnology" or "hyperprogramming" and said it was worth $2 trillion dollars. would the corporation mandating the boilerplatey template system be willing to embrace a less-boilerplatey template system then
Replies (1)
-
@glyph@mastodon.social 2026-11-04 16:49
@mcc@mastodon.social @vathpela@infosec.exchange @jcoglan@mastodon.social the only flaw in this plan is that this technology would involve a well-compensated labor force whose psychological well-being was respected and cultivated, and the real purpose of “AI” is to destroy that. if they could destroy the power of labor without all the “boilerplate” stuff they’d be doing that instead