2026-02-28 01:59 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@drmoose@lemmy.world 2026-02-28 04:42
I'm a parent and legit think that majority of parents should not have been parents and have no minimum required skill to raise a human being. It's sad because it's really not that hard but most people don't think a day ahead when raising their kids and just follow a "vibe", so spending a weekend on parental controls is an insurmountable task.
-
@Joelk111@lemmy.world 2026-02-28 06:34
As usual, the solution is education. Parental education needs to be prioritized imo. That said, I have no idea how we would implement such a thing. Most likely better general education would help at least.
-
@IratePirate@feddit.org 2026-02-28 03:49
"Won't _anyone_ think of the cHiLdReN?!"
-
@Archr@lemmy.world 2026-02-28 22:08
Just want to clarify that nowhere in the actual law does it require verifying the age of the user. It does not require IDs or face scans. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043 Please read it. It is a very short law <15 minute read tbh. The law does exactly what you ask for. Parents setup the device and put their child's age. If they lie or circumvent the system then the parents get fined if their child is affected by content on the internet.