@faket I'm assuming "good" stands here for "having principal means of not being bought"? In that case yeah, no. Despite bsky.social having central authority over some aspects of the network, people can self host. Naiive me will hope for complete decentralisation, but this is AFAIK as "good" as it can get in the space of popular social networks if we don't count fedi. If "good" stands for "not evil", then 🤷 don't have any hints that the intent there would be to dismantle democracies or something. If "good" means "technically good", then I would just vaguely point at anything UX related wrt/ Mastodon. I never interacted with BSKY UI, but can't really imagine it being ... more challenging than masto. IDK, you'd have to be more precise.